Engie UK and Ireland CEO Wilfrid Petrie has called for further devolution of policy to regions and cities in order to serve an increasingly decentralised energy system.
Speaking at the ADE’s heat conference in London, Petrie added that the future for large utilities was in services, not generation. Half of the firm’s revenues, he said, now came from services.
“There is more value to us today in reducing the amount of commodity customers use – and that is clearly where we position ourselves,” said Petrie.
Market economics have forced the firm to take that approach. Engie, said Petrie, has written off €15bn of central generation assets, with the broader utilities industry dumping more than €100bn, some splitting off business units, others attempting to reinvent themselves. Petrie described it as “a landslide, a dramatic change for most energy companies”.
However, he pointed out that Engie’s revenues remained steady. “€15bn [our write downs] may have surprised some people,” said Petrie. “The good news is that we are the same organisation with the same net result. We just have to adapt and change.”
To enable that transition, said Petrie, “policy must allow these adjustment locally”.
Acknowledging that it was “a bit late for the Autumn Statement”, Petrie said his “biggest wish” was for “energy and energy efficiency policy to be developed locally”.
He also called for business rates that are “fair for heat networks compared to other utilities” over regulation of the heat network market.
“We do not have an opinion” on whether heat networks should be a regulated industry, said Petrie. “Good regulation may provide clarification [for investors],” he said, but more importantly, “I would like a fair footing with other utilities”.
National Grid boss: Future of energy is demand not supply
British Gas: £4bn energy efficiency opportunity for UK firms
Centrica buy’s Ener-G’s CHP unit in bid to scale distributed generation business
Centrica to cut 3,000 jobs as utilities feel heat
GDF Suez touts gas to grid earner
Local authorities invited to apply for heat network funding by end of November
Local authorities must scope heat networks better to get funding
Scrap renewable heat and energy targets and prioritise energy efficiency, government urged
The heat is on, but which technologies will decarbonise heat at lowest cost?
Decc consults on how £320m heat networks funding should be spent
Heat networks ‘could be subsidy free within five years’ with right framework
Government ‘has heat network numbers wrong’
Solar thermal and storage ‘key to decarbonise heat’
Heatpumps, biomass and CHP top firms’ heat investments for 2016
Waste heat a wasted opportunity
75p/kWh subsidies for district heating?
Brussels increases focus on energy efficient heating and cooling
Decentralisation the key to heat networks?
Tim Rotheray: Put users at heart of energy policy or watch it fail
CHP behind 6% of UK electricity, could do more
Councils step up heat network plans
Firms with CHP generators could be paid to stop exporting power
Local Authorities say finance and public procurement biggest barrier to heat networks
Free report: Financing energy efficiency
Click here to see if you qualify for a free subscription to the print magazine, or to renew.
Follow us at @EnergystMedia. For regular bulletins, sign up for the free newsletter.
An interesting subject with a brilliant headline 🙂
Neither centralised nor disconnected. Modern energy suppliers should be allowed to take over or tap into local networks to integrate with CHP/CCHP. That would help drive the roll-out of heat networks and unblock the log-jam that seems to exist with ‘business as usual’. CHP should be guaranteed a price for power export – with generation based upon equivalent injection of bio-gas deemed ‘renewable’, whilst fossil/fracked fuel would not be deemed LZC and would have to pay for CO2 and NOx. All plant would have to be Euro 6 minimum or equivalent current standard. Standard utility terms of service would apply.
If suppliers offered PV and solar thermal along with property fabric upgrades etc they should get ‘super ECAs’ to allow low-income, housing association, and other similar households to be offered affordable deals. Similar deals could be available on sale/purchase to finance improvements and incentivise homeowners without this being a subsidy to the relatively wealthy.Commercial property would have to upgrade or sell out as at present.