You only live twice: battery storage from EVs

Lumsden: Push the batteries harder to capture immediate opportunity

Matthew Lumsden, CEO of Connected Energy, believes second life electric vehicle batteries could play a major role in balancing the grid – and potentially help companies earn more money than via new storage systems that are bound by warranty constraints.

Others share his conviction. Engie and Macquarie recently invested £3m in his company, which takes second hand battery packs from Renault electric vehicles, to create storage systems ranging from 60kWs to megawatts.

These systems can be used more intensively than some warranties for new batteries allow. That means owners can maximise cycling to take a larger share of the spoils currently available.

Speaking at The Energyst Event, Lumsden cited Bloomberg projections of a global non-automotive storage market of about 300GW a year by 2030, with second life batteries representing somewhere between 40GWh and 340GWh a year at that point.

That creates a significant liability for car manufacturers, said Lumsden, but an equally significant opportunity to harness proven technology. He says the systems can be used for providing flexibility services, renewables optimisation, peak shaving and arbitrage while boosting resilience.

Lumsden adds a “surprising” number of enquiries are also based around sustainability.

While he says Connected Energy has yet to fully quantify the sustainability of a second life system versus a new battery storage system, “if you look at the embedded energy, carbon and natural resources in the battery, we are getting batter value from them, perhaps doubling their lifespan.”

Go hard, make more

Asked how the system compares with a new storage system on whole life cost, Lumsden says the key comparator is whole life revenue.

“If we use the batteries as productively as we can to maximise revenue, it might mean faster degredation,” he says.

“The trade off is higher lifetime costs but more revenue. Or you can use them less intensively: the batteries degrade more slowly, and therefore you have lower lifetime costs, but that approach does not optimise revenue,” says Lumsden.

“So it’s quid pro quo. We can operate to customers’ requirements whether to maximise revenue or longevity,” he adds. “But once you have the power electronics, the balance of system, they are second life batteries; they are lower cost, so replacing the battery packs can be cost effective.”

Larger footprint

Lumsden says the batteries Connected Energy uses are typically seven years old and about 25% degraded. As such, the footprint of its systems is “around 50% bigger” than a new system. Lumsden says the company is not attempting to make them as small as possible, more “on creating robust, low cost, versatile systems”.

‘Super safe’

While Connected Energy promotes opportunities around intensive use, Lumsden says its second life batteries are inherently safe.

“We use the battery packs exactly as they are provided by manufacturer. So they benefit from all the OEM’s investment in terms of controls and safety mechanisms,” he says.

“The system is super safe. The batteries have all of the metal housing they had when in the vehicle, all of the vehicle manufacturers’ safety mechanisms, then our box with its own safety mechanisms as well,” adds Lumsden. “So it’s a metal box within a metal box.”

Connected Energy’s power control module “talks to batteries in their own language” via the CAN protocol, he adds, so that the battery is controlled in the same way as it is in the vehicle. In effect, it doesn’t ‘know’ it is not still in a car.

“So providing frequency services, for example – short, sharp peaks of charge and discharge – is very similar to somebody putting their foot on the accelerator and the breaking cycle of an electric car,” says Lumsden.

Where next?

The company is talking to both public and private sector end users. Dundee City Council will use one of its boxes as part of a solar-battery EV charging port. Meanwhile, Lumsden says industrial and commercial companies are interested for all the usual behind-the-meter applications, with firms able to visit the company’s Norfolk R&D centre to see “how it works in the flesh”.

Lumsden says aggregators “certainly those with larger portfolios” are also interested in adding high-cycling assets to their portfolios “to run as often as is commercially sensible”.

“We have a huge diversity of enquiries,” says Lumsden. “The key is to pick right one.”

Related stories:

‘Land grab’ for EV car parks and revenue

Energy managers ‘to become fleet managers as EVs rise’

Electric vehicle boom no sweat, says National Grid

Electric vehicles ‘won’t require new power stations’, say analysts

Northern Powergrid: EVs a resource not a problem

EVs ‘could provide 11GW of flex’

National Grid focuses on bringing smaller firms and EVs into flexibility

Lord Redesdale: Idea of EVs as battery storage is ‘complete crap’

Flexitricity chief: UK has enough spare power electrify every car on the road

Greg Clark calls for automakers and energy industry to collaborate on battery storage

Engie and Macquarie invest £3m in second life EV battery storage firm

Tesla: People don’t engage with energy bills, but they will have to

Click here to see if you qualify for a free subscription to the print magazine, or to renew.

Follow us at @EnergystMedia. For regular bulletins, sign up for the free newsletter.


  1. I have solar panels on my roof, and now marketing information-exchange has resulted in a number of phone calls from people wanting to sell me new batteries to enable me to meet electricity demand in the evening using power stored in the day. Nobody suggests lithium-ion, but NiMh or even lead-acid (needing too much maintenance). Entry cost is a minimum of £2K,, not justifiable for a one-person household (since I need an additional card in the invertor at £500?). But part-used lithium ion might be cost effective, particularly since a 15KWH (originally 30) battery should get me through 3 or more overcast days in summer. At a Loss to the Grid of course, where the money is better used in turning off gas turbines.. But without a Smart Meter, nobody will see the reduction in feed-in tariff that would otherwise occur. Just tossing ideas around for now.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here